Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think this is a feature addition that you've cleverly managed to
> > present as a bug fix ;-). While I like the feature, I've got very
> > mixed emotions about applying it this late in beta.
> > Ok, you caught me :-) Actually, I developed the patch thinking only on
> > the multi-relation TRUNCATE, with the goal of having it for 8.1. Only
> > after I prepared a first patch I noticed the temp-table-FKs problem.
> Well, like I said, I have mixed emotions. Anyone else have an opinion
> whether to apply now or hold for 8.1?
My initial reaction is to hold it all for 8.1. The patch is large and
the bug is rare.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2004-11-06 22:13:47|
|Subject: Re: contrib/xml2: add function xml_encode_special_chars|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-11-06 20:30:22|
|Subject: Re: ON COMMIT and foreign keys |