Re: ON COMMIT and foreign keys

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ON COMMIT and foreign keys
Date: 2004-11-06 20:30:22
Message-ID: 11404.1099773022@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
> I think this is a feature addition that you've cleverly managed to
> present as a bug fix ;-). While I like the feature, I've got very
> mixed emotions about applying it this late in beta.

> Ok, you caught me :-) Actually, I developed the patch thinking only on
> the multi-relation TRUNCATE, with the goal of having it for 8.1. Only
> after I prepared a first patch I noticed the temp-table-FKs problem.

Well, like I said, I have mixed emotions. Anyone else have an opinion
whether to apply now or hold for 8.1?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-11-06 20:37:13 Re: ON COMMIT and foreign keys
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-06 20:29:17 Re: cygwin build failure