Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Date: 2004-11-05 15:22:55
Message-ID: 200411051622.55820.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Am Freitag, 5. November 2004 14:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> I'll repeat an observation I made (more or less) last time we had this
> discussion: the loudest voice in it belongs to those who actually use
> the repository most. When Tom or Bruce or Peter (for example) tell us we
> need to change I'll take lots more notice.

I'm certainly open to considering subversion, although I have a certain
traumatic experience with it that may or may not be related to the BDB
backend that it uses.

I think for a start it would be nice if pgfoundry could optionally offer
subversion (and/or arch) for source control, so that some developer groups
and also our system administrators could get some experience with it.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joachim Wieland 2004-11-05 15:28:38 Documentation on PITR still scarce
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-11-05 14:24:31 Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-11-05 15:44:18 Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-11-05 14:24:31 Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die