| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | nd02tsk(at)student(dot)hig(dot)se, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: The reasoning behind having several features outside |
| Date: | 2004-10-30 19:39:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20041030163852.U6085@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> Replication is one subsystem not included in source tree. But PostgreSQL
>> has other subsystems that are included such as plugins for procedural
>> languages. So isn't the same risks involved with them?
>>
>
> No, not really. Because items such as plPerl don't require
> changes to the backend. Replication requires changes to the backend.
Replication doesn't require changes to the backend ... neither eRServer or
Slony-I do, at least ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-10-30 20:05:59 | Re: The reasoning behind having several features outside |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-10-30 19:15:44 | Re: The reasoning behind having several features outside |