Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Why is Gborg still listed?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is Gborg still listed?
Date: 2004-10-30 16:57:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Hello,
> It was my understanding that Gborg is deprecated and that we are trying to
> get people to move to the new infrastructure, specifically 
> Gforge/
> It seems that even more people are using Gborg now. I see:
> PgOleDB
> pl/Java
> Slony
> npgsql

these were all before we had PgFoundry in place ... there are procedures 
being worked on to move projects over with minimal loss of data (ie. 
database conversion routines from gborg schema -> pgfoundry schema), but 
they haven't been finalized yet ...

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-10-30 17:20:20
Subject: Re: Why is Gborg still listed?
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-10-30 16:19:13
Subject: Why is Gborg still listed?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group