| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why is Gborg still listed? |
| Date: | 2004-10-30 16:57:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20041030135547.H6085@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It was my understanding that Gborg is deprecated and that we are trying to
> get people to move to the new infrastructure, specifically
> Gforge/projects.postresql.org?
>
> It seems that even more people are using Gborg now. I see:
>
> PgOleDB
> pl/Java
> Slony
> npgsql
these were all before we had PgFoundry in place ... there are procedures
being worked on to move projects over with minimal loss of data (ie.
database conversion routines from gborg schema -> pgfoundry schema), but
they haven't been finalized yet ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-10-30 17:20:20 | Re: Why is Gborg still listed? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-10-30 16:19:13 | Why is Gborg still listed? |