Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Inconsistent behavior with AGE()

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior with AGE()
Date: 2004-10-28 22:34:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> Actually, the definition of the single-parameter variants of age() is
>         age(current_date, $1)
> not
>         age(now(), $1)
> I'm not sure this is wrong, but perhaps it should be better documented.

Hmmm ... well, if that's the definition, then we probably don't need to change 



Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: 杨邕Date: 2004-10-29 07:26:30
Subject: Insertion Deferrable
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-28 22:22:45
Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior with AGE()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group