Re: Inconsistent behavior with AGE()

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior with AGE()
Date: 2004-10-28 22:34:12
Message-ID: 200410281534.12873.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom,

> Actually, the definition of the single-parameter variants of age() is
>         age(current_date, $1)
> not
>         age(now(), $1)
>
> I'm not sure this is wrong, but perhaps it should be better documented.

Hmmm ... well, if that's the definition, then we probably don't need to change
it.

--Josh

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 杨邕 2004-10-29 07:26:30 Insertion Deferrable
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-28 22:22:45 Re: Inconsistent behavior with AGE()