Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

JDBC CTS 1.2.1 (was: Re: patch: bring org/postgresql/test/README up to date)

From: Vadim Nasardinov <vadimn(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: JDBC CTS 1.2.1 (was: Re: patch: bring org/postgresql/test/README up to date)
Date: 2004-10-27 18:15:39
Message-ID: 200410271415.39796@vadim.nasardinov (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
On Friday 22 October 2004 18:40, Kris Jurka wrote:
> I've applied this, but I think more effort should be made in getting
> this information into the documentation on the website:

Sure, that makes sense.  I hadn't noticed this document.  The CVS page
[1] did not mention that in addition to

  $ cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anonymous(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org:/usr/local/cvsroot/pgjdbc co -P pgjdbc

you could also check out

  $ cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anonymous(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org:/usr/local/cvsroot/pgjdbc co -P www

Now that you mentioned it, I'll keep this in mind.

> >  The document refers to
> >
> >  Would it make sense to provide instructions for the seemingly
> >  newer test suite available at
> >
> Yes.  I know Dave Cramer was spending some time trying to get
> PostgreSQL to pass the newer version, so you might hit him up for
> the sql scripts and configuration he used.

Before attempting to tackle the 1.3.1 suite, I tried to get 1.2.1 up
and running.  My results are as follows:

    PASSED:  1778
    FAILED:   510

The attached report lists the names of failing tests.  Do these
numbers seem to be in the right ballpark, or am I wildly off base
here?  I haven't begun to take a closer look at failures [2] yet.
Thought I'd ask here first.

BTW, I wrote a little script to automate the testsuite setup [3].  If
anyone finds it useful, it might make sense to find a place for it in



Attachment: report.txt
Description: text/plain (10.5 KB)

In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2004-10-27 19:46:27
Subject: Re: using 8 bit ascii
Previous:From: Anders HermansenDate: 2004-10-27 13:38:57
Subject: Re: using 8 bit ascii

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group