pgsql: In the new dispensation where REINDEX doesn't take exclusive lock

From: tgl(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org (Tom Lane)
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: In the new dispensation where REINDEX doesn't take exclusive lock
Date: 2004-10-25 15:42:02
Message-ID: 20041025154202.D12373A4136@svr1.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Log Message:
-----------
In the new dispensation where REINDEX doesn't take exclusive lock on
the parent table, it's essential that all index accesses take some kind
of lock on the index. I had missed vacuumlazy.c :-( ...

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/src/backend/commands:
vacuumlazy.c (r1.47 -> r1.48)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c.diff?r1=1.47&r2=1.48)

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-26 16:05:03 pgsql: Make heap_fetch API more consistent by having the buffer remain
Previous Message User Dpage 2004-10-25 09:25:44 pginstaller - pginst: Version number bump.