Re: [HACKERS] Need for DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib

OK, I removed DLLINIT from Cygwin Makefile.shlib so it is now the same
as Win32. I don't see any easy way to use ifeq to test multiple port
strings so I didn't merge the duplicate Win32 and Cygwin Makefile
actions.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reini Urban wrote:
> Jason Tishler schrieb:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:37:48AM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
> >>Bruce Momjian schrieb:
> >>
> >>>I am curious why Cygwin needs DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib, and Win32
> >>>doesn't:
> >>>
> >>> [snip]
> >>>
> >>>The only difference I see is that Cygwin uses $(DLLINIT) while Win32
> >>>does not. Is that correct? Why?
> >>>
> >>>Both set DLLINIT in their makefiles:
> >>>
> >>> DLLINIT = $(top_builddir)/src/utils/dllinit.o
> >>>
> >>>Could they be merged into a single snipped of code?
> >>
> >>Good point! Out of my head: I don't think that we (cygwin) don't need
> >>that anymore. With newer binutils it should get autogenerated. But
> >>I'll have to test before you can remove that dir.
> >
> >
> > I concur with Reini. The DLLINIT stuff is a vestige from b20.1. FWIW,
> > I attempted to remove it 3 - 4 years ago, but was unsuccessful...
>
> I build successfully without this DLLINIT yestreday, and ran then into
> the one remaining regression error, which I reported before (during
> inserting some polygons in the parallel suite).
>
> But this is for sure not related, so you can safely clean that mess up,
> (remove that dir) and merge the win32 and cygwin makefile recipe.
> --
> Reini Urban
> http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073