| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2004-10-04 19:10:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20041004191023.GA8261@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 01:55:21PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> While we're discussing things that will possibly mean a different system
> than the current function language, I have another request: Can we have
> a means of defining procedures/functions that doesn't involve using
> quotes? Having to double-quote everything is extremely annoying and
> prone to errors. I realize that even if procedures/functions aren't
> defined using quotes there will still be cases where things need to be
> multi-quoted, but those cases are much rarer.
So you aren't aware of the dollar-quoting feature? You may want to take
a look at that ...
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Limítate a mirar... y algun día veras"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-10-04 19:14:34 | Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-04 19:01:12 | Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore |