| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Server unreliability |
| Date: | 2004-09-29 21:04:01 |
| Message-ID: | 200409292304.01401.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Tom Lane wrote:
> We all know perfectly well what the problems are ---
> it's a matter of finding time, and sometimes money, to solve them.
> We don't need "new ideas" unless the ideas are about how to produce
> those resources.
Throwing more resources at an entity that does not scale won't achieve
anything. In order to improve, we need to listen to competing concepts
and pick the best one, not keep giving the current one more time over
and over.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-09-29 21:15:01 | Infrastructure TODO list |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-09-29 20:56:15 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-09-29 21:15:01 | Infrastructure TODO list |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-09-29 20:56:15 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability |