From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 'TID index' |
Date: | 2004-09-16 01:26:19 |
Message-ID: | 20040916012619.GX56059@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 10:56:28PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> There are many good ideas out there, yet it is almost impossible to find
> somebody else to implement yours!
>
> The acid test is to try and write it...
>
> Overall, I agree VACUUM could do with some tuning - and 8.0 has just that.
> It needs very careful thought to make sure both concurrency and
> recoverability considerations are fully met in any solution you come up
> with.
Heh, I wasn't even thinking of implentation yet. :) I fully understand
the lack of developers.
Unfortunately, I have very little idea on the internals of PGSQL, and
I'm decidedly not a C coder. I *might* be able to get something hacked
up that stores info in a table (since that would mean all the space
management stuff would be handled for me).
If this is a worthwhile idea can we at least get a TODO? Would it be
useful to come up with a high-level design (something I could probably
do)?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-09-16 01:33:15 | Re: PostgreSQL Core Committee Welcomes New Member |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-09-16 00:50:19 | Re: PostgreSQL Core Committee Welcomes New Member |