Re: 'TID index'

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 'TID index'
Date: 2004-09-16 01:26:19
Message-ID: 20040916012619.GX56059@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 10:56:28PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> There are many good ideas out there, yet it is almost impossible to find
> somebody else to implement yours!
>
> The acid test is to try and write it...
>
> Overall, I agree VACUUM could do with some tuning - and 8.0 has just that.
> It needs very careful thought to make sure both concurrency and
> recoverability considerations are fully met in any solution you come up
> with.

Heh, I wasn't even thinking of implentation yet. :) I fully understand
the lack of developers.

Unfortunately, I have very little idea on the internals of PGSQL, and
I'm decidedly not a C coder. I *might* be able to get something hacked
up that stores info in a table (since that would mean all the space
management stuff would be handled for me).

If this is a worthwhile idea can we at least get a TODO? Would it be
useful to come up with a high-level design (something I could probably
do)?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-09-16 01:33:15 Re: PostgreSQL Core Committee Welcomes New Member
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-09-16 00:50:19 Re: PostgreSQL Core Committee Welcomes New Member