Re: Sixth Draft

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Joshua Kramer <josh(at)bitbuckets(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sixth Draft
Date: 2004-09-02 21:18:52
Message-ID: 200409021418.52435.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Folks,

> While I like your wording re: who can change the source tree, I think we
> need to step back and ask a philosophical question: what is the purpose of
> this press release? To attract new users. Does talk about who can commit
> to the source tree create a compelling reason to use PostgreSQL over the
> alternatives? I don't think it does. There's also the issue of word
> count; IIRC Josh Berkus said he wanted it around 1000 words, and last time
> I counted it had about 1800. I think we should leave out the details
> about who commits, and just say that it's a BSD license (and explain what
> BSD license entails).

Also keep in mind that the PR will link to a web page, where we can throw in
the kitchen sink in terms of text. So I'd favor any such extraneous
information -- like what BSD licensing means to users -- on the web page but
NOT in the PR. I'm going to need to prune as it is.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Kramer 2004-09-02 21:26:18 Re: Sixth Draft
Previous Message Richard Welty 2004-09-02 21:15:00 Re: Sixth Draft