Re: [OT?] Problems with majordomo :-)

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Ennio-Sr <nasr(dot)laili(at)tin(dot)it>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT?] Problems with majordomo :-)
Date: 2004-08-31 22:56:19
Message-ID: 20040831195529.F31538@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:15:27PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> there are two ways in which a message would drop off the face of the earth
>> ... Spamassassin scored it high enough to be considered spam, or the virus
>> checker detected a virus :( In both cases, the messages are just drop'd
>> into /dev/null ...
>
> Don't forget my problem with mail being lost in the air with a strange
> error message from a postmaster somewhere in the relay chain (I suspect
> commandprompt.com) It was never resolved, and I had one person telling
> me a week ago that he could not subscribe to the list for this reason (I
> had to subscribe him manually).

True, but at the suggestion of the Majordomo developers, I've since
removed the relays ... they are suspecting that part of the 'slow
delivery' problem that we've been seeing is a result of DNS issues slowing
things down ;(

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ennio-Sr 2004-08-31 23:15:27 Re: [OT?] Problems with majordomo :-)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-31 22:52:15 Re: expected both swapped tables to have TOAST tables