Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel

From: "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel
Date: 2004-08-30 01:31:47
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
The system is a cobalt raq, I am also going to test on some decstations (also mipsel) and SGI (mips) systems.

I didn't use the disable-spinlock option.  will try tomorrow.  i did see some mips spinlock code in s_lock.c.  
Shouldn't this also work on mipsel CPU's?


---------- Original Message -----------
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jim(at)contactbda(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:27:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta 1 failed on linux mipsel 

> "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com> writes:
> > trying to test beta 1 on Debian linux mipsel (sarge).
> What is that, a playstation 2?  Last we heard, that chip had no spinlock
> support.  Did you use configure --disable-spinlocks?
> 			regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
------- End of Original Message -------

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-30 01:42:57
Subject: Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-08-29 23:34:29
Subject: Re: FYI: 8.0beta2 on Monday

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group