Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel

From: "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel
Date: 2004-08-30 01:31:47
Message-ID: 20040830012716.M55067@contactbda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The system is a cobalt raq, I am also going to test on some decstations (also mipsel) and SGI (mips) systems.

I didn't use the disable-spinlock option. will try tomorrow. i did see some mips spinlock code in s_lock.c.
Shouldn't this also work on mipsel CPU's?

Jim

---------- Original Message -----------
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jim(at)contactbda(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:27:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta 1 failed on linux mipsel

> "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com> writes:
> > trying to test beta 1 on Debian linux mipsel (sarge).
>
> What is that, a playstation 2? Last we heard, that chip had no spinlock
> support. Did you use configure --disable-spinlocks?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
------- End of Original Message -------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-30 01:42:57 Re: beta 1 failed on linux mipsel
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-29 23:34:29 Re: FYI: 8.0beta2 on Monday