Re: pgsql-server: > Please find enclose a submission to

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Peter has replied to previous patches so I assume he would have
> > > commented on this one if he didn't like it. It was already
> > > adjusted to take Peter's comments into account.
> >
> > The question is has anyone reviewed it? I certainly haven't,
> > because I was expecting Peter to review it (and commit it if
> > appropriate).
> >
> > When we are in beta I do not think the default action for submitted
> > patches should be "apply unless someone objects". We need a higher
> > standard in this period, ie, actual careful review.
>
> OK, Peter, you want to look at that patch?

I've said several times before that I did not particularly like the
functionality added by that patch (building non-server modules, and
building contrib modules outside the normal build system). Therefore,
I didn't put it high in the to-look-at queue. It might help if someone
else would comment on whether we want this.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/