Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX?
Date: 2004-08-27 16:32:43
Message-ID: 200408271632.i7RGWh206951@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> What happened to the B-Tree Table patch discussed on Hackers ad nauseum last
> winter?

I don't remember that. The only issue I remember is sorting btree index
by heap tid on creation. We eventually got that into CVS for 8.0.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adi Alurkar 2004-08-27 16:51:00 Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-08-27 16:31:06 Re: Equivalent praxis to CLUSTERED INDEX?