Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Back on track -- 8.0 Press Release

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Back on track -- 8.0 Press Release
Date: 2004-08-27 16:34:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Can we get back to the main work of Advocacy?    I still need help composing 
the 8.0 press release.   Below is the last non-fragmentary post.    

Can some people here please take a stab at explaining each major feature to 
the layman?    10-20 words each.   Thanks!


I'd like to see some sample text here.  But please remember that the *entire* 
press release will be less than 1000 words, so no paragraph-long descriptions 
of a single feature!  (for example, Rod's description of replication options 
was nice but would have to be condensed to about 14 words, if we include it 
at all)  More detailed descriptions will go on our "news" page.

As a compromise between Peter's perspective and mine/Andrew's, I think that we 
should focus on the features but name-drop.  So we need to work in company 
names at appropriate points, namely Fujitsu, Afilias, Red Hat, Open Source 
Development Labs, Command Prompt, 2nd Quadrant, and SRA-America (am I 
forgetting someone?).   The names should get across the multi-company 
involvement without dwelling on it.

Please take a stab at:

P1: announce landmark 8.0 version, 200 developers, etc.  4-5 lines, starting 
with a sentence that covers who-what-when.

P2: major features, windows port, contributions by several new companies, 
work with OSDL.  4-5 lines, again.

List: Major features:
        Windows Port
        Memory/I/O overhaul
        Planner improvements
-- each of the above should include 10 to 20 words about what the feature is 
and why people should be excited about it.  

P4: discuss major add-ins: Slony-I, PL/perlNG, PL/Java, etc.
        "more features for dedicated PG users, see full release".
-- this paragraph will just *mention* the new add-ins for the last year; there 
is no need (or space) to go into detail.  My purpose for this paragraph is 
that for a lot of news sources, this is the only coverage of PG they will 
have all year, making it important to mention prominent add-ins let the 
public think we are missing features.

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: eleinDate: 2004-08-27 17:45:05
Subject: flyer links
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-08-27 14:28:45
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Quality Evaluation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group