Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris <list(at)1006(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900
Date: 2004-08-24 06:18:10
Message-ID: 200408240818.10313.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> > If that's not worth the trouble, would it be a good idea to have
> > configure disable spinlocks automagically on unsupported platforms?
>
> It used to do that. We deliberately changed this in 8.0 so that
> people would be aware that they were losing performance, and would be
> motivated to look into possible solutions.

Actually, the previous port report for 7.4 already required explicit
disabling:

needs new config.guess, --disable-spinlocks

(We fixed that first point anyway.)

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-24 06:27:22 Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2004-08-24 06:09:17 Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900