Re: pgsql-server: > Please find enclose a submission to

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: > Please find enclose a submission to
Date: 2004-08-21 00:12:53
Message-ID: 200408210012.i7L0CrI27820@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Peter has replied to previous patches so I assume he would have
> > commented on this one if he didn't like it. It was already adjusted to
> > take Peter's comments into account.
>
> The question is has anyone reviewed it? I certainly haven't, because
> I was expecting Peter to review it (and commit it if appropriate).
>
> When we are in beta I do not think the default action for submitted
> patches should be "apply unless someone objects". We need a higher
> standard in this period, ie, actual careful review.

OK, Peter, you want to look at that patch?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-21 00:26:54 pgsql-server: Recent tightening of allowed array-literal syntax broke
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-21 00:09:10 pgsql-server: Whack btree_gist code around until it has some small hope