Re: [PATCHES] Bug: century/millenium still broken

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bug: century/millenium still broken
Date: 2004-08-16 16:00:01
Message-ID: 200408161600.i7GG01a18783@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches


Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Dear Tom,
>
> > After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly,
> > why does CVS tip still give me
> >
> > regression=# select extract(century from now());
> > date_part
> > -----------
> > 20
> > (1 row)
> > [ ... looks in code ... ]
> >
> > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not
> > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or
> > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well.
>
> Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-(
>
>
> > Could we have a more complete patch?
>
> Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade,
> century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval
> and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results
> are reasonnable, it would be great.
>
> I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch
> fixes the code so that both variants agree.
>
> I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C
> division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7.
>
> As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the
> century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't
> think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium)
> for rounding all years of the third millenium.
>
> I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199
> means the 1990's.
>
> I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The
> formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep
> them.
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> --
> Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

Content-Description:

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-08-16 16:09:12 Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-16 15:58:49 Re: [BUGS] 8.0.0beta1: -lpthread missing

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-08-16 16:09:12 Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-08-16 15:59:17 Re: Postgresql.conf Documentation change