| From: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |
| Date: | 2004-08-13 18:30:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20040813143009.O90265@xeon.unixathome.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>
> >>>> To be fair :) the only thing that makes Slony notable for PostgreSQL is
> >>>> that it is Open Source. There are other replication systems out there
> >>>> that have been working for some time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Uh, and we are an open source project --- Slony being "open source"
> >>> seems like a very notable distinction to me.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thanks for pointing out what I already had :)
> >
> > My point was that saying it is the "only thing" that makes it notable is
> > to minimize a major point of pushing Slony. It is "the" notable issue.
>
> Not it isn't, as there are other Open Source replication solutions for
> PostgreSQL, as I pointed out before ... Slony is effectively "the fashion
> of the day", and next release, there could be 'yet another of the many'
> that is that much better ...
Under which case, we'll be talking about that solution.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems] | 2004-08-13 18:44:47 | Guidlines for a PostgreSQL Speech/Tutorial |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-08-13 18:07:07 | Re: add-ons and kernelization was Time to work on |