| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |
| Date: | 2004-08-13 13:45:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20040813104323.F4756@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Every time PostgreSQL is discussed, be that slashdot or LWN or other
> forums or even interviews with any of out competitors, the statement is
> "doesn't have replication". If we avoid the topic in our 8.0 press
> release and leave out the word replication, instead of pointing to the
> reasons why it is *better not to have replication builtin*, we will
> lose. People will read the press release, don't see the word
> replication, so "No Replication - checkmark".
Except that "Have Replication" to those claiming 'No Replicatin' means
"Integrated with the Server", we still don't *have* Replication in their
minds, no matter how many external projects that do it we mention ;(
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-13 14:08:01 | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-08-13 13:29:11 | Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0 |