Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0

From: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
Date: 2004-08-12 20:56:07
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > To be fair :) the only thing that makes Slony notable for PostgreSQL is
> > that it is Open Source. There are other replication systems out there
> > that have been working for some time.
> Uh, and we are an open source project --- Slony being "open source"
> seems like a very notable distinction to me.

My very basic knowledge of Slony gave me the impression that is was
solving problems that other replication systems had not yet solved.
These issues centered around masters/slaves, promotions, additions,
withdrawals, catch up, etc.  I have no details and I am certain that I'm
using the wrong terminology.

Dan Langille -

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-08-12 21:03:08
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
Previous:From: Michalis KabrianisDate: 2004-08-12 20:52:59
Subject: Is it a worthy case study?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group