Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
Date: 2004-08-12 18:29:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> Seems an awful lot of focus on Afilias/Fujitsu, no?  Is it a PR about us, 
> or them? :( If we are going to highlight contributors, Redhat (all of 
> Tom's time, which is a *major* contribution) and CommandPrompt (pl/PHP) 
> should be in there, among others I know I'm overlooking ...

Probably.   I guess what I'm fishing for is a paragraph on expanded corporate 
contributions to PostgreSQL, regardless of from whom they came.  Afilias and 
FJ are easier because they're tied to specific contributions, whereas RH is 
propping up our spiritual leader.  CMD, of course, would show up in a mention 
of PL/perlNG.

Overall, I would *love* to have someone take a stab at a single, 4-5 line 
"expanded corporate participation" paragraph that mentions most companies.   
The press is really interested in knowing what companies back PostgreSQL.  
Also, it helps drum into reporters that PostgreSQL is not a single-company 

-Josh Berkus
 "A developer of Very Little Brain"
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-08-12 18:37:18
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-08-12 18:22:29
Subject: Re: Time to work on Press Release 8.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group