Re: pg_dump and sequences (bug ?)

From: strk <strk(at)keybit(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and sequences (bug ?)
Date: 2004-08-12 10:46:39
Message-ID: 20040812104639.GA75121@freek.keybit.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

With help from Christopher I've made some other tests.
Neither 7.4 nor 7.5/8.0 pg_dump are able to detect the
error. Here is a summary:

The produced dump creates a SEQUENCE SET call with no
corresponding SEQUENCE or TABLE SCHEMA creating the
sequence. No Error or warning is issued at dump time,
nor it is at vacuum time.

A currupted catalog set is probably be the reason.
Shouldn't pg_dump warn about that ?
Is there a catalog corruption detection app ?

TIA

--strk;

On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 01:40:40PM +0200, strk wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 12:50:43PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Also, given this and your previous operator commutator problem, I
> > strongly suspect that someone has taken an axe to the system catalogs on
> > your installation and they are very screwy.
>
> System catalogs screws are possible.
> That someone is probably me, but I don't remember pg_dump
> giving me any warning about this. Also I think I've run vacuum
> on the db before dumping.
>
> As before I'm not on the source computer so I can't send the
> pg_dump -s, but if you want, I can send you the pg_restore -l.
>
> --strk;
>
>
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > strk wrote:
> >
> > >Using pg_dump from postgresql 7.3.4 I've obtained
> > >a dump file containing a SEQUENCE SET with no
> > >corresponding SEQUENCE. I've seen that this is usually
> > >due to the presence of a table with a 'serial' field,
> > >but since in this case there is no such table I wonder
> > >if this is a bug in pg_dump.
> > >
> > >The only reason I can imagine for this is pg_dump taking
> > >any sequence whose name ends in _seq as being associated
> > >to a table, no matter if that table exists and has a 'serial'
> > >field. Is this possible ? Shouldn't this kind of dependency
> > >be coded somehow ?
> > >
> > >TIA
> > >
> > >--strk;
> > >
> > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > >TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message LISTMAN 2004-08-12 10:49:36 Re: [HACKERS] Where does the xlateSqlType symbol point
Previous Message Andreas Krennmair 2004-08-12 10:09:00 PostgreSQL 8.0.0beta1 and diet libc