From: | Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Liam Lesboch <liamlesboch(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication options? |
Date: | 2004-08-11 19:38:34 |
Message-ID: | 20040811193834.37304.qmail@web20826.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > That probably won't impress your bosses. If you
> need
> > a track record, then erServer might be what you
> need.
> > erServer is a commercially produced product that
> was
> > (is still?) used by Afilias, the provider of
> registry
> > services for the .info and .org domains. That's
> > serious testing; very large databases and lots of
> > traffic.
>
> > Note that Afilias paid for the development of
> Slony-I;
>
> ... because they were quite unhappy with erServer
> ...
>
> Now erServer did work for them, but it required
> significant amounts of
> tuning and constant babysitting by the DBA. (If
> Andrew Sullivan is
> paying attention to this thread, he can offer lots
> of gory details.)
> I can also personally testify that getting erServer
> set up is a major
> pain in the rear. I haven't messed with Slony, but
> all reports are that
> it's a substantially better piece of code.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Granted...
Liam's bosses want something with a history of
successful use in a serious production situation, and
erServer at least has that. Slony has been around for
too short a time to make that claim, yet.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-08-11 19:54:28 | Re: Replication options? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-11 19:38:09 | Re: 7.4.3 server panic |