Re: Ready for Beta ... ?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ready for Beta ... ?
Date: 2004-08-08 19:36:53
Message-ID: 20040808163553.Y52647@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Andreas Pflug wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, there's the logfile rotation issue...
>>>
>>>
>>> With rotatelogs not supporting it, it is hard to argue we should,
>>> especially this close to beta. We can revisit it in 8.1.
>>
>> How about 8.0Beta2? I consider this as a bug, after all postings for
>> logfiles did support it.
>
> Adding a function will require a system catalog change. If we are
> already doing one we might be able to get it in, but I doubt it greatly.
>
> We already do more than rotatelogs by specifying a size. That seems
> enough to me for now.
>
> Basically I think you will need a vote to expand this in 8.1.

Hate to ask, but can someone summarize what it is that is being
"discussed" here? Andreas' post about 'size triggering' is what drew my
eye, but I think I missed the central point :(

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-08-08 19:42:06 Re: The new try/catch macros
Previous Message Kevin Brown 2004-08-08 19:09:32 Re: DROP TABLESPACE causes panic during recovery