Re: why is postgres-R not in standard dev Path.

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why is postgres-R not in standard dev Path.
Date: 2004-08-02 08:42:43
Message-ID: 200408020842.i728ghG21045@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Browne wrote:
> naveen(dot)bysani(at)gmail(dot)com (chinni) writes:
> > Postgres-R is a multi server (write anywhere) replication tool
> > which is possibly important for any enterprise if they want to shift
> > to postgres.
> >
> > Did you guys debate on merging it.
>
> I seem to recall there being a licensing issue; Postgres-R uses the
> "Spread" communications toolkit that is distributed under a license
> reasonably dissimilar to that of PostgreSQL proper.

We can get a waver on that license. I talked to the Spread folks a few
years ago and they were fine with that. I said we could do the
advertizing better than trying to get the individual users to mention it
somewhere.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-02 10:13:28 Re: fix schema ownership on first connection preliminary patch
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2004-08-02 08:17:59 Re: shared buffer hash table corrupted