Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Klaus Naumann <kn(at)mgnet(dot)de>,markw(at)osdl(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Date: 2004-07-29 06:10:18
Message-ID: 200407290610.i6T6AIS07458@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I do think we need a boolean for start/stop of archiving, rather than
> > setting it to '' to turn it off.  Tom, I think the group agreed to this
> > on clarity grounds.
> 
> I didn't see any consensus there, nor do I see a point to it.

I saw a lot of people saying it was a good idea, and only you saying it
was a bad idea.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-07-29 08:48:41
Subject: Re: 7.5 devel initdb failure
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2004-07-29 06:04:46
Subject: Re: try/catch macros for Postgres backend

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Daniel StruckDate: 2004-07-29 09:16:08
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Secure DB Systems - How to
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2004-07-28 20:16:10
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Secure DB Systems - How to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-07-29 08:52:10
Subject: Re: win32 version info
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-07-29 05:58:06
Subject: Re: logger subprocess

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group