| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2004-07-21 20:24:58 |
| Message-ID: | 200407211324.58538.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Simon,
> The Aberdeen report is very poorly written. ISTM that they are confused
> as to which database is which and have done very little research beyond
> they "spoke to some MySQL users". The report seems to have been
> re-published recently, with no updated facts. If your listening boys,
> sue me - I could do with a new car.
Apparently the author no longer works for Aberdeen. So maybe they weren't
happy with the report either. I took up the inaccuracies with SleepyCat,
who commissioned the report, and they took it up with Aberdeen ... but I
don't know what happened after that. Certainly they haven't corrected the
report.
I don't think there's anything we *can* do at the moment other than take it up
with an attorney, which really hasn't been our project's style.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-07-21 20:25:46 | Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-21 20:17:58 | Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL |