Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "David F(dot) Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option
Date: 2004-07-21 03:26:50
Message-ID: 200407210326.i6L3QoR16250@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Philip Warner wrote:
> At 12:59 PM 21/07/2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >Yes, no need for it. We discourage that.
>
> Might be polite, not to mention legally required, to check with the author
> of the patch first.

To be clear, we will ask the author if we can remove it, and if they say
no, we will reject the patch.

That's not a polite way to put it, but it is our procedure.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-21 05:49:54 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Previous Message Philip Warner 2004-07-21 03:21:58 Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Holdoway 2004-07-21 04:09:54 Re: Borland c++ compile problems...
Previous Message Philip Warner 2004-07-21 03:21:58 Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new