| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ODBC Developers |
| Date: | 2004-07-17 21:05:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200407172305.24496.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Dave Page wrote:
> Which makes me think - should we add or remove placeholders for
> unimplemented functions? The important thing is that SQLGetFunctions
> is correct of course, however we should be consistent. I'm kinda on
> the fence about which way to go on that one. On one had the
> placeholders are useful reminders that work needs to be done - on the
> other, they do add to the code needlessly.
I would leave it as is. As long as the fraction of placeholders
compared to the implemented functions is low, it's not really a
problem.
What could be useful is a TODO file listing missing functions and other
issues.
> convert.c should (imho) make odbc.sql obsolete as much as possible.
I've fixed a few bugs in convert.c and verified all the functions.
odbc.sql is obsolete and removed.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David P. Lurie | 2004-07-19 02:54:46 | error with access 2003 - column "ctid" does not exist |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-17 18:56:58 | Note on libtool |