From: | "Jonathan M(dot) Gardner" <jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Documentation on new features? |
Date: | 2004-07-17 19:12:27 |
Message-ID: | 200407171212.28943.jgardner@jonathangardner.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 17 July 2004 9:55 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jonathan M. Gardner wrote:
> > Should I submit documentation changes to the sgml files for nested
> > transcations? It will most likely be wrong, but maybe enough will be
> > right that those who know better won't have to spend much time.
>
> It would certainly be appreciated if you could work on this. Please
> contact the author of the nested transaction feature to get the
> technical details.
I posted a patch on the SQL reference pages to the patches list. I didn't
touch the tutorial or the MVCC page, and I don't know enough to do
anything in the internals section.
- --
Jonathan Gardner
jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA+Xobqp6r/MVGlwwRAkmsAJ4u6xhaj5RQFFaK5QXtBwDE7aKZjwCgkr/G
grJErCtlWYalhqOrNr5Pty8=
=DrKL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-17 19:18:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-17 19:08:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |