Re: serverlog rotation/functions

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: serverlog rotation/functions
Date: 2004-07-16 22:56:34
Message-ID: 200407162256.i6GMuYd04754@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
> > Right. We already have to use shared mem for the backends and
> > postmaster. It is the logger we are worried about.
> >
> > Tom brought up the point that if the logger used shared memory, we would
> > have to kill/restart it if we need to reinitialize shared memory,
>
> I don't know why that particular segment should ever be renewed. Anyway,
> it's gone.

As I remember, we have one big shared memory segment. Where you
creating a special one just for this timestamp? If you were, I see why
your approach was safer, but as you said, it doesn't buy us much anyway.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2004-07-16 22:59:47 Re: serverlog rotation/functions
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2004-07-16 22:49:51 Re: serverlog rotation/functions