| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant |
| Date: | 2004-07-12 20:49:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20040712174830.A867@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> that he "Used Daniel's Elephant", which I believe refers to Daniel
>> Lundin, though I don't recognize that name. Note also that that page
>> indicates that those logo's are for the community, not the corporation,
>> which in essence would mean that the company has posted that the logo is
>> for the community.
>
> I think the real problem is that while the community elephant and the
> postgresql, inc. elephant is the same, there is a unintended endorsement by
> the community to postgresql, inc.
>
> This is by no means a slam on postgresql, inc but it seems the community has
> always tried to be very business neutral and per Marc's own email
> the elephants should be different.
Per my own email? Huh? I'm against changing something that we've worked
>4 years on branding into ppl minds ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-07-12 20:51:46 | Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-07-12 20:35:36 | Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant |