| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All |
| Date: | 2004-07-10 20:30:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200407101330.16458.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dennis, Bruce,
> Just to clarify, this is to allow rolling back to the same savepoint
> multiple times. If we named savepoints, the new savepoint would be the
> same name as the one we just rolled back.
Hmmm ... yeah, it would be nice to find a way around this so that we don't
have non-standard behavior we have to work around once savepoint names are
implemented. Suggestions?
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-10 20:33:58 | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-10 20:25:42 | Status report |