Re: New News Entry

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New News Entry
Date: 2004-06-19 19:01:20
Message-ID: 200406191201.20722.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Tom,

> > Personally I think it's reasonable to have some guidelines, not
> > hard rules. In this case maybe we could suggest a time constraint:
> > "major release" announcements are ok if they're at least a year apart.
> > (Or six months, or whatever we feel is appropriate.)

Absolutely. The reason why I brought it up is that it's apparent that not
everyone on this list, even, agrees what the guidelines ought to be. We need
a consensus.

> But, I do agree about the time constraints ... maybe throw in a 'past
> track record' also?

Well, that's where we make exceptions, sometimes. For example, if OpenACS
sent us an announcement that wasn't a major release, we might put it up
anyway -- becuase they're very friendly to postgres, they're OSS, and they
have yet to post an announcement of any kind. Bricolage, on the other hand,
we'd stick to the "rules"; David sends me an announcement every patch
release.

for instance, we release 7.5.0, and it will generally
> be ~1 month before 7.5.1 comes out, but it may be 3 before 7.5.2 does ...

Oh, for the PostgreSQL project we post whatever we want. It *is* the
postgresql.org web site, after all.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin M. Roy 2004-06-19 19:48:37 Websites you like
Previous Message World Wide Web Owner 2004-06-19 17:39:30 New Event