Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: New News Entry

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New News Entry
Date: 2004-06-18 22:38:49
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www

My personal opinion on policy:

For software (or hardware) which is not PostgreSQL community, but is "useful" 
or "newsy" as we define it, we announce it when it either
	1) goes production for the first time,
	2) supports postgresql for the first time
and never post news about that particular piece of software again unless 
there's a compelling reason to make an exception.

For software which is PostgreSQL community, we allow announcements when it:
	1) is created as a project;
	2) first goes beta (if it needs testers);
	3) first goes production;
	4) achieves a major (e.g. 2.0) version milestone
but leave it up to the project admin what they want to try and post.

agreement/disagreement/rude noises?

I simply can't see any circumstance under which we would want to post 
individual beta releases on the main page.   Heck, we don't do that for 
PostgreSQL itself ... one beta or RC version, and that's it.

-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-06-18 23:16:43
Subject: Re: New News Entry
Previous:From: Gavin M. RoyDate: 2004-06-18 21:41:46
Subject: Re: What now?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group