Re: stderr & win32 admin check

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stderr & win32 admin check
Date: 2004-06-16 00:35:08
Message-ID: 200406160035.i5G0Z8a12504@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So? I don't follow why "run it as a service" isn't a sufficient answer,
> >> and indeed the preferred way to do it.
>
> > We don't know what the usage pattern is going to be on Windows - I think
> > we need to keep it as flexible as possible consistent with good
> > security.
>
> Sure, but I draw the line at running Postgres with admin privileges.
> "Flexibility is more important than security" is exactly the mindset
> that has gotten Microsoft into their current bed of nails.

Easy of use is also one of the reaons MS is so popular and on so many
computers. I am not advocating we allow unsecure usage, but I am
pointing out that security and easy of use are important.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Natoli 2004-06-16 00:43:45 Re: stderr & win32 admin check
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-16 00:26:17 Re: stderr & win32 admin check