From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |
Date: | 2004-06-16 00:35:08 |
Message-ID: | 200406160035.i5G0Z8a12504@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So? I don't follow why "run it as a service" isn't a sufficient answer,
> >> and indeed the preferred way to do it.
>
> > We don't know what the usage pattern is going to be on Windows - I think
> > we need to keep it as flexible as possible consistent with good
> > security.
>
> Sure, but I draw the line at running Postgres with admin privileges.
> "Flexibility is more important than security" is exactly the mindset
> that has gotten Microsoft into their current bed of nails.
Easy of use is also one of the reaons MS is so popular and on so many
computers. I am not advocating we allow unsecure usage, but I am
pointing out that security and easy of use are important.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-06-16 00:43:45 | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-16 00:26:17 | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |