Re: msession for PostgreSQL?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: msession for PostgreSQL?
Date: 2004-06-11 17:58:15
Message-ID: 20040611175815.GD30686@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:51:04AM -0400, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:

> The best part of it could be that it could replace the whole msession C
> API with PostgreSQL. You can join against the various data, and it should
> be very fast with no MVCC overhead for those aspects of your project that
> don't need it while still allowing them to be incorporated with the data
> that does.

I don't get it. If msession is already successful as it is, why do you
want to change it?

It seems to me you are looking for problems to solve. If you want to
code, there are lots of ideas in PostgreSQL's TODO.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-11 18:03:28 Re: [PATCHES] Compiling libpq with VisualC
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2004-06-11 17:51:41 Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC