Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding IN(...))

From: Frank van Vugt <ftm(dot)van(dot)vugt(at)foxi(dot)nl>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding IN(...))
Date: 2004-06-10 15:32:08
Message-ID: 200406101732.08594.ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Wow,

The effectiveness of the pgsql mailinglists never ceases to amaze me.

Default sort mem it was, I guess I'd simply been to cautious with this
per-client setting.

Stephan & Tom : thanks!

--
Best,

Frank.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Luc Lachance 2004-06-10 15:45:02 Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-06-10 15:19:35 Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding IN(...))