Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, David Blasby <dblasby(at)refractions(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info
Date: 2004-06-02 16:53:55
Message-ID: 200406021653.i52Grvb05389@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:23:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > If we go with a global CID counter then we don't have to add that step.
> >
> > Seems Alvaro is already using a global counter.
>
> I think I stated already that I'm in fact using it. Not sure why it
> didn't show up in the list.

Yes, I saw it. I wrote "seems" when I should have wrote it as a fact.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgsql 2004-06-02 17:54:57 Default Locale in initdb
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-06-02 16:46:37 Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info