| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, David Blasby <dblasby(at)refractions(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info |
| Date: | 2004-06-02 15:47:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20040602154733.GA9227@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 11:12:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> A global CID counter would also simplify other visibility tests. Alvaro
> hasn't said anything about how he's doing visibility checks across
> different subxacts of the same main xact, but without global CID there
> would need to be some pretty ugly checks to determine whether a subxact
> happened before or after the CID cutoff your outer xact is interested
> in.
Yes, I'm using a global CID counter.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"La vida es para el que se aventura"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-02 16:23:37 | Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-02 15:35:01 | Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER |