Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL
Date: 2004-05-28 15:25:16
Message-ID: 20040528152516.GA21203@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 09:54:40AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I'm not sure this would give actual additional performance though,
> because (btree-) index creation appears to be slowed down by excessive
> unnecessary WAL traffic. I'm sure this can be handled better; Tom Lane

It doesn't buy you linear scaling in performance, because of the WAL
issues you metioned. But because index creation is also sort-heavy,
it's still a big help. Chris and I know this from experience,
because we used this very strategy (his proposal, I note) in
importing the .org database. I mentioned this approach at OSCON last
year.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
--Roger Brinner

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan Gardner 2004-05-28 20:23:45 Re: have you seen this?
Previous Message efesar (the kay) 2004-05-28 14:49:43 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] win32 port getting popular