Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 port getting popular

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 port getting popular
Date: 2004-05-27 15:59:39
Message-ID: 200405271559.i4RFxds05670@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers-win32

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> The binary win32 port has been downloaded over 3000 times since May 6,
> which averages to over 1000/week (and steadily increasing). This is
> with no mention except for win32-hackers list and Bruce's win32 status
> page. This is of course in addition to users who have compiled the
> database from source.
>
> Type in 'win32 native port' or 'win32 status page' into google, and
> Bruce's win32 status page comes up first or second (notice no mention of
> Postgres in search criteria).

I am seeing this too with other searches. In many cases, a PostgreSQL
mailing list link comes up on Google searches you wouldn't expect.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-05-27 16:55:13 Re: I want to use postresql for this app, but...
Previous Message Tyler Mitchell 2004-05-27 15:55:54 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 port getting popular

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bob.Henkel 2004-05-27 16:14:48 nested transaction patch build?
Previous Message Tyler Mitchell 2004-05-27 15:55:54 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 port getting popular