| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_type oid's do they change from version to version |
| Date: | 2004-05-20 01:41:12 |
| Message-ID: | 200405200141.i4K1fC909500@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > True, but have we ever removed types? I can't think of one.
>
> Hmmm...perhaps.
>
> >>We have removed a few functions in 7.4 (oidsrand, etc.) and I wouldn't
> >>be surprised if we haven't _already_ reused those oids...
> >
> > Yes, for functions that is very true.
>
> I wonder if that has any implications for future binary upgrade tools...
I don't think so because we use the new system catalogs for upgrades and
just move the user data.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-20 01:43:22 | Re: Clustering system catalog indexes |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-05-20 01:41:06 | Re: pg_type oid's do they change from version to version |