| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures |
| Date: | 2004-05-17 19:18:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200405171918.i4HJIDE21711@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
> > Well, if I issue a "REVOKE" and the rights are not revoked and could never
> > have been because I have no right to issue such statement on the object, I
> > tend to call this deep absence of success a "failure".
>
> > If I do the very opposite GRANT, I have a clear "permission denied".
>
> Oh, I thought you were complaining that revoking rights not previously
> granted should be an error. I agree with the above; in fact it's a
> duplicate of a previous complaint.
Did we resolve this? Is it a TODO?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-05-18 07:10:30 | Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-17 12:42:09 | Re: Patch for not going beyond NOFILE system limit |